Christopher Heyman vs Leopold Zima Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Heyman vs L. Zima

Christopher Heyman
BEL
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
32
Age
25
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
6'1" (185 cm)
812
C. Rank
895
258
Best Rank
774
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Leopold Zima
GER
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
32
Age
25
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
6'1" (185 cm)
812
C. Rank
895
258
Best Rank
774
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Heyman 2 - 0 Zima
They have played 5 sets in total, with Christopher Heyman winning 4 and Leopold Zima winning 1. The last match between Christopher Heyman and Leopold Zima was at the M25 Nussloch, 22-01-2020, Round: R1, Surface: Carpet, with Christopher Heyman getting the victory 6-3 6-7(1) 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Heyman | 2 |
| Zima | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Nussloch(01-22-20)
Christopher Heyman
6
6
6
Leopold Zima
3
7
4
(R2) Germany F16 (Hamburg)(10-24-18)
Christopher Heyman
6
6
Leopold Zima
2
3
C. Heyman vs L. Zima H2H Profile
C. Heyman vs L. Zima Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Christopher Heyman has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Leopold Zima has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Christopher Heyman, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Leopold Zima has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Christopher Heyman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Leopold Zima has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Christopher Heyman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Leopold Zima winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Christopher Heyman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 113/58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 42/31). Leopold Zima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 53/35), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 64/67).
- Player level: In the last year, Christopher Heyman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Leopold Zima has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Christopher Heyman winning 2 times and Leopold Zima being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Christopher Heyman winning 4 and Leopold Zima winning 1.
- The last match between Christopher Heyman and Leopold Zima was at the M25 Nussloch, 22-01-2020, Round: R1, Surface: Carpet, with Christopher Heyman getting the victory 6-3 6-7(1) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:26:30.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Christopher Heyman has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Leopold Zima has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Christopher Heyman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Leopold Zima has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Christopher Heyman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Leopold Zima has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Christopher Heyman vs Leopold Zima Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Heyman vs L. Zima H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 30 | Games Won | 19 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 18 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:26:30 | Average Match Time | 1:26:30 |
| 76% (96/127) | 1st Serve % | 58% (83/144) |
| 78% (75/96) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (59/83) |
| 71% (22/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (28/61) |
| 64% (7/11) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (1/4) |
| 40% (57/144) | Return Points Win % | 24% (30/127) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Heyman 0%, Zima 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Heyman 0%, Zima 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Heyman 0%, Zima 0%.
C. Heyman Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 4-1 ret. | ||
L. Zima Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-7(5) 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(2) 5-7 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 3-6 7-5 6-2 | ||

C. Heyman vs L. Zima Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.65% (352/201) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.03% (161/137) |
| 60.44% (767/502) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.17% (364/308) |
| 54.57% (6451/5370) | Games Win/Loss | 51.30% (3308/3140) |
| 66.08% (113/58) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.23% (53/35) |
| 61.11% (154/98) | Clay Win/Loss | 48.85% (64/67) |
| 65.38% (85/45) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.70% (44/35) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 1139 | Aces Total | 963 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 887 | Total Double Faults | 516 |
| 1:18:55 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 560.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 364.49 |
| 69% (19517/28466) | 1st Serve % | 63% (7490/11907) |
| 68% (13201/19517) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (5243/7490) |
| 52% (4639/8949) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2004/4417) |
| 46% (1323/2869) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (429/1045) |
| 41% (11509/28052) | Return Points Win % | 37% (4405/11801) |
| 40.00% (26/39) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/9) |
| 66.80% (326/162) | Futures W/L | 55.71% (161/128) |
| 64% (343/540) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (161/297) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (86/169) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (35/67) |
| 60% (99/166) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (35/77) |
| 89% (339/301) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (159/141) |
| 11% (339/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (159/18) |
| 24% (214/51) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (139/20) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
09:30 PM 16/11/25
Prediction11:30 PM 16/11/25
Prediction06:00 PM 16/11/25
Prediction05:05 PM 16/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction10:00 PM 16/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
16 Nov 2025
Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
20:00
H2H 10-5
18:45
H2H 1-0
17:05
H2H 0-0
18:20
H2H 0-0
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal